This blog is mainly about the spectacular train wreck at The Sacramento Bee and its parent company, the McClatchy Company. But I also post about current events, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, politics, anything else that grabs my attention. Take a look around this blog, hope you enjoy it.
Friday, March 6, 2009
Sacramento Bee Guild voting this afternoon
I'll have the results of the vote for you when they are posted. You can read the proposal at the Guild's site here. . . .
7 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Press Release
California Media Workers Guild
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contacts: Wendy Mejia 916-716-2783
Ed Fletcher 916-524-0775
Sacramento Bee newsroom and advertising employees voted Friday to accept a 6 percent wage cut for most employees, in addition to other cost cutting concessions.
The vote, ratifying the company’s contract proposal, saves 19 jobs that Bee managers had threatened to otherwise add to the guild-covered 34 jobs already slated for elimination. But it means all Guild-represented employees must accept pay cuts starting in April, potential furloughs in the second half of 2009, and a cap on vacation accrual.
The contract was approved with the support of 65 percent of the voting members.
“This was one of those plug your nose kind of votes,” said Ed Fletcher, the Sacramento unit chair for the California Media Workers Guild, which represents 268 of The Bee’s 1,126 full- and part-time workers.
“On one hand, our members are committed to saving jobs, protecting the long-term interests of The Bee, and fostering good journalism. But on the other hand, many employees grew frustrated the company wouldn’t listen to our cost-cutting measures that inflected less pain on employees.”
“Why force people out the door when the workforce could be reduced through voluntary buyouts?” Fletcher asked.
The Guild also had hoped to negotiate an agreement with the company that there would be no further layoffs through the end of the year. Without that agreement, members are literally sticking their neck out to save the jobs of others and getting no assurance theirs won’t be next on the chopping block.
“In the end, employees recognized we were between a rock and a larger rock. We chose the less sharp rock,” Fletcher said.
Without the pay cuts, 53 newsroom and advertising employees would have been laid off, further damaging our news operation at a critical time for our industry. Bee layoffs
(numbers only represent Guild-covered positions) Newsroom Advertising Total W/reduction
Let's name names when they become available. It's interesting how squeamish the "civil and professional" people are about their own reputations when they worked so hard to destroy others.
Notice how they give you a percentage in vote total, but give you a hard number in how many they speak for?
I wonder exactly why that is? Anyone care to guess? Were 15 or 20 people allowed to decide this fate? Does the 65% margin mean one or two votes?...Questions, Questions.
7 comments:
Press Release
California Media Workers Guild
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contacts: Wendy Mejia 916-716-2783
Ed Fletcher 916-524-0775
Sacramento Bee newsroom and advertising employees voted Friday to accept a 6 percent wage cut for most employees, in addition to other cost cutting concessions.
The vote, ratifying the company’s contract proposal, saves 19 jobs that Bee managers had threatened to otherwise add to the guild-covered 34 jobs already slated for elimination. But it means all Guild-represented employees must accept pay cuts starting in April, potential furloughs in the second half of 2009, and a cap on vacation accrual.
The contract was approved with the support of 65 percent of the voting members.
“This was one of those plug your nose kind of votes,” said Ed Fletcher, the Sacramento unit chair for the California Media Workers Guild, which represents 268 of The Bee’s 1,126 full- and part-time workers.
“On one hand, our members are committed to saving jobs, protecting the long-term interests of The Bee, and fostering good journalism. But on the other hand, many employees grew frustrated the company wouldn’t listen to our cost-cutting measures that inflected less pain on employees.”
“Why force people out the door when the workforce could be reduced through voluntary buyouts?” Fletcher asked.
The Guild also had hoped to negotiate an agreement with the company that there would be no further layoffs through the end of the year. Without that agreement, members are literally sticking their neck out to save the jobs of others and getting no assurance theirs won’t be next on the chopping block.
“In the end, employees recognized we were between a rock and a larger rock. We chose the less sharp rock,” Fletcher said.
Without the pay cuts, 53 newsroom and advertising employees would have been laid off, further damaging our news operation at a critical time for our industry.
Bee layoffs
(numbers only represent Guild-covered positions)
Newsroom Advertising Total
W/reduction
(’yes’ vote)
26 8 34
W/o reduction
(’no’ vote)
37 16 53
Jimmy Hoffa is rolling in his grave underneath Fort Knox.
Let's name names when they become available. It's interesting how squeamish the "civil and professional" people are about their own reputations when they worked so hard to destroy others.
Bee layoffs (numbers only represent guild-covered positions)
With reduction
Newsroom: 26
Advertising: 8
Total: 34
Without reduction
Newsroom: 37
Advertising: 16
Total: 53
"The contract was approved with the support of 65 percent of the voting members."
Notice how they give you a percentage in vote total, but give you a hard number in how many they speak for?
I wonder exactly why that is? Anyone care to guess? Were 15 or 20 people allowed to decide this fate? Does the 65% margin mean one or two votes?...Questions, Questions.
Check out the headlines on television Web sites and other McClatchy newspapers like the Merced Sun-Star. They're all "Guild approves cuts in pay."
I toldja McClatchy manglement/mengelement were a bunch of slime devils.
I wonder how the Guild members feel about how McClatchy slanted coverage of the proposal and the vote. This could be a good object lesson for them.
Post a Comment