This blog is mainly about the spectacular train wreck at The Sacramento Bee and its parent company, the McClatchy Company. But I also post about current events, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, politics, anything else that grabs my attention. Take a look around this blog, hope you enjoy it.
After four decades of urging students, hippies, communists, and agitators to come out en masse to protest the U.S. government, protests that commonly turned to violence, Democrats are at last finding a protest they don’t like because, with the healthcare debate, this time it is a protest of them and not by them.
Amazingly, Democrats have suddenly discovered that government should be meekly accepted, wholly given in to, obeyed without question and a lap dog Old Media has seemingly agreed. Any of you that heard only as little as a year ago that “protest was patriotic,” or that “dissent was the highest form of patriotism” are now gravely informed that to say a cross word against the Obammessiah makes one “dangerous.”
And now, Democrat Party bigwigs are passing down the directives to their Congressional membership that townhalls are verboten from this point forward. Congressmen returning to their districts are being told to find ways to avoid their voters as much as possible.
Instead of holding large meetings, now Democrats returning back home are trying to corral voters into small gatherings, one-on-one meetings, phone calls, or simply not meeting with them at all. These cowards realize that their efforts to back Obama’s socialist take over of nearly 20% of the American economy is anathema to a large portion of the electorate and they don’t want to hear about it. These elected officials’ minds are made up and what the voters want is immaterial.
///They won’t see their healthcare plan downgraded or rationed, like us.///
No, your plan (assuming you aren't one of the fortunate ones who have lost theirs through layoffs) isn't going to be downgraded or rationed under any of the current bills. In fact, it may be better, and more important, secure. And when you reach 65, you'll have an even more health security: You'll be eligible for Medicare.
SEIU and AARP have sold out their members and are embarking on a failed course of action - blind obedience to Obama's health care "plan." SEIU is the Gestapo arm and AARP provides the propaganda. It's an Obamination.
You've got the talking points down pat. Now tell us why the drafters of your plan refuse to apply it to themselves, federal employees and union members.
After that you can explain why they refuse to remove the provisions forcing conditions that require the government plan.
Please explain who the, "Community Organizations are that will be charged with tracking each individuals food, tobacco and alcohol intake and providing Death Counseling.
Could you also fill us in on just who it is that will be deciding on what treatments I can and cannot have, if not my doctor?
After that, could you tell me why the government will need access to my bank account?
While you're at it. Who are the "under privileged" people that universities are supposed to be giving preferential treatment toward in becoming health care workers?
What I am reading isn't a health care plan my friend. It is a totalitarian take over of the entire health care system that demands that government has the right to say who lives and who dies and when.
This bill should be defeated by any and all means necessary. Bar none.
5:48, you have the insurance-industry's talking points down pat. Congratulations. But maybe you need to ask yourself why all these frightening things you've been told will happen under any of the health security bills under consideration haven't happened under Medicare (which has been around more than 40years). And, after you've answered that question, you might try actually reading the bills with an open mind, keeping Medicare in mind.
5:48, you have the insurance-industry's talking points down pat.
All I have down is the bill right in front of me and I asked you for a few answers to the very things listed in the bill. I also asked you why your representatives voted down the amendment that would have applied the bill to themselves equally.
6:02 A few weeks ago Obamacare was all about cost reductions and covering the "46 million uninsured". Now that both of those bubbles popped the drumbeat is about the insurance companies. And you have pivoted right on cue. Good job. Here's a treat.
And, after you've answered that question, you might try actually reading the bills with an open mind, keeping Medicare in mind.
=============
In other words, ignore exactly what it says and don't pay any attention to the implications, because we'd never take advantage of what we're building into it.
When a leftist tells you to look at their proposal with an, "open mind", head for the hills, it's a trick. Ignore what we say, trust us.
And, after you've answered that question, you might try actually reading the bills with an open mind, keeping Medicare in mind.
The fact is there is only one bill as all alternatives and amendments offered were rejected in favor of the socialist take over.
But you would know that if you yourself had read it. And you want to lecture people on what how good it is and what is a scare tactic. You're pathetic.
6:09 through 6:42 (alias 5:48): Why is it that all these frightening things you think (after being told) will happen under any of the health security bills under consideration haven't happened under Medicare (which has been around more than 40years)?
8:23 PM Address the questions please. I for one would like to hear the answers. Why are you trying to change the subject? Why are you attempting to win an argument with fictitious events that allegedly occurred many decades ago with entirely different legislation.
I don't think 8:23 is trying to win an argument. He or she is trying to make you think instead of mouthing talk radio sound bites. If that would cause a mental crisis in your life, don't feel you have to bother.
You're not trying to make anyone think. You're trying to change the subject because you have no answers to questions that expose this bill for what it is.
19 comments:
Funny what the media (MSDNC, CBS, ABC, CNN, NY Times, and McClatchy) think of real Americans.
The people who used to buy their papers and watch their trash, are now called, “Mobs” “Organized Right-Wingers” and Teabaggers.”
After fully supporting the SEIU, I can see no reason anyone would buy or suscribe to their papers.
People should cancel their suscriptions, and tell them to stop shilling for the DNC.
Remember, It's easy for Sebelius and her SEIU gestapo to pimp DeathCare.
They won’t be required to participate in DeathCare.
They won’t have their private healthcare plans taxed to pay for it, like us.
They won’t see their healthcare plan downgraded or rationed, like us.
To the Dems, you're a rightwing extremist if you disagree with Obama, Pelosi & Friends. Guess most of the country turned extremist overnight.
SEIU. Promoting Obamacare,
one beat-down at a time
Democrats: Anything to Avoid Meeting With Voters
After four decades of urging students, hippies, communists, and agitators to come out en masse to protest the U.S. government, protests that commonly turned to violence, Democrats are at last finding a protest they don’t like because, with the healthcare debate, this time it is a protest of them and not by them.
Amazingly, Democrats have suddenly discovered that government should be meekly accepted, wholly given in to, obeyed without question and a lap dog Old Media has seemingly agreed. Any of you that heard only as little as a year ago that “protest was patriotic,” or that “dissent was the highest form of patriotism” are now gravely informed that to say a cross word against the Obammessiah makes one “dangerous.”
And now, Democrat Party bigwigs are passing down the directives to their Congressional membership that townhalls are verboten from this point forward. Congressmen returning to their districts are being told to find ways to avoid their voters as much as possible.
Instead of holding large meetings, now Democrats returning back home are trying to corral voters into small gatherings, one-on-one meetings, phone calls, or simply not meeting with them at all. These cowards realize that their efforts to back Obama’s socialist take over of nearly 20% of the American economy is anathema to a large portion of the electorate and they don’t want to hear about it. These elected officials’ minds are made up and what the voters want is immaterial.
///They won’t see their healthcare plan downgraded or rationed, like us.///
No, your plan (assuming you aren't
one of the fortunate ones who have lost theirs through layoffs) isn't going to be downgraded or rationed under any of the current bills. In fact, it may be better, and more important, secure. And when you reach 65, you'll have an even more health security: You'll be eligible for Medicare.
SEIU and AARP have sold out their members and are embarking on a failed course of action - blind obedience to Obama's health care "plan." SEIU is the Gestapo arm and AARP provides the propaganda. It's an Obamination.
3:45 PM
You've got the talking points down pat. Now tell us why the drafters of your plan refuse to apply it to themselves, federal employees and union members.
After that you can explain why they refuse to remove the provisions forcing conditions that require the government plan.
Please explain who the, "Community Organizations are that will be charged with tracking each individuals food, tobacco and alcohol intake and providing Death Counseling.
Could you also fill us in on just who it is that will be deciding on what treatments I can and cannot have, if not my doctor?
After that, could you tell me why the government will need access to my bank account?
While you're at it. Who are the "under privileged" people that universities are supposed to be giving preferential treatment toward in becoming health care workers?
What I am reading isn't a health care plan my friend. It is a totalitarian take over of the entire health care system that demands that government has the right to say who lives and who dies and when.
This bill should be defeated by any and all means necessary. Bar none.
5:48, you have the insurance-industry's talking points down pat. Congratulations.
But maybe you need to ask yourself why all these frightening things you've been told will happen under any of the health security bills under consideration haven't happened under Medicare (which has been around more than 40years).
And, after you've answered that question, you might try actually reading the bills with an open mind, keeping Medicare in mind.
5:48, you have the insurance-industry's talking points down pat.
All I have down is the bill right in front of me and I asked you for a few answers to the very things listed in the bill. I also asked you why your representatives voted down the amendment that would have applied the bill to themselves equally.
You couldn't answer even one. That's sad.
6:02 A few weeks ago Obamacare was all about cost reductions and covering the "46 million uninsured". Now that both of those bubbles popped the drumbeat is about the insurance companies.
And you have pivoted right on cue.
Good job. Here's a treat.
And, after you've answered that question, you might try actually reading the bills with an open mind, keeping Medicare in mind.
=============
In other words, ignore exactly what it says and don't pay any attention to the implications, because we'd never take advantage of what we're building into it.
When a leftist tells you to look at their proposal with an, "open mind", head for the hills, it's a trick. Ignore what we say, trust us.
Yeah right.
And, after you've answered that question, you might try actually reading the bills with an open mind, keeping Medicare in mind.
The fact is there is only one bill as all alternatives and amendments offered were rejected in favor of the socialist take over.
But you would know that if you yourself had read it. And you want to lecture people on what how good it is and what is a scare tactic. You're pathetic.
6:09 through 6:42 (alias 5:48): Why is it that all these frightening things you think (after being told) will happen under any of the health security bills under consideration haven't happened under Medicare (which has been around more than 40years)?
8:23 PM Address the questions please. I for one would like to hear the answers. Why are you trying to change the subject? Why are you attempting to win an argument with fictitious events that allegedly occurred many decades ago with entirely different legislation.
You're making no sense.
I don't think 8:23 is trying to win an argument. He or she is trying to make you think instead of mouthing talk radio sound bites. If that would cause a mental crisis in your life, don't feel you have to bother.
You're not trying to make anyone think. You're trying to change the subject because you have no answers to questions that expose this bill for what it is.
Obama's national health care is going down - whether you like it or not.
As in, in flames.
Post a Comment