Saturday, September 6, 2008

Sacramento Bee: "Pruitt's resignation from 4 family trusts doesn't mean anything -- it's just good corporate governance"

The Sacramento Bee published an odd item on Gary Pruitt's resignation from 4 McClatchy trusts that control a big chunk of the newspaper company's voting power. According to the Bee article, McClatchy's treasurer, Elaine Lintecum, says the move "is just good corporate governance."
In a move described as an effort toward better corporate governance, Gary Pruitt, the chairman and chief executive of The McClatchy Co., has resigned from a group of trusts that controls much of the voting power in the company.
More:
Pruitt's resignation was disclosed in a filing Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission. He stepped aside because of the company's desire to seek "improved governance," McClatchy Treasurer Elaine Lintecum said Saturday.

"It seemed better governance to break up the roles," she said. "It was better to have him not have so many hats."

Why is the board all of a sudden is the family concerned about better governance? Where have they been over the last 2 years?
As McClatchy has struggled financially in the past two years and its stock price has plunged, Pruitt has talked about some day taking the company private - buying back all the shares and removing McClatchy from the ranks of publicly traded companies. But he has said going private is a long way off because the company is already heavily in debt. Lintecum said his resignation from the trusts isn't tied to any kind of financial restructuring.

"It's not a precursor to anything," she said.

If you believe that, raise your hand. Something else is going on, folks.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Howard Weaver just clamped a moderation policy on his blog site. Something is clearly about to happen, and I don't think it is going necessarily to be good.

Anonymous said...

I'm certainly hoping whatever happens is good. of course I still work for the company, and would like to keep it that way.

Anonymous said...

The best thing Gary Pruitt could do for corporate governance at this point is to resign. It would save oodles in severance for him just to sign a resignation letter and leave. It is going to take a hell of a lot of work to get this company back on sound financial footing, and the damage Pruitt has done is irreparable.

Anonymous said...

Whi is Howard Weaver???

Anonymous said...

Howard Weaver, McClatchy vice president:
http://editor.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

I just read Howard Weaver's blog. They just don't get it. They Howard & Gary still have THEIR jobs and make millions but us peons are just McClathcy haters. I only wish that some editor would have the guts to print some of whats really going on. They would have a lot less readers.

Anonymous said...

...McClatchy can't even get an internal operations story right when they have all the facts, and nobody else does. Anybody who would loan them a pazooza is oppsie tweets.

Anonymous said...

I just cannot believe it, but on Friday MNI created the eighth vice president, a $500,000 a year job, plus benefits. This as they are now implementing MNI-wide layoffs and buyouts. These guys are just unreal.

Anonymous said...

They may be unreal.. but most likely it's the McClatchy elite milking the dying cash cow.

Pruitt can stay or go. But no shake-up, or privatization, or fire sale -- will make that billion dollar debt evaporate and restore ad revenue.

Anonymous said...

Many of us are worried when it comes time to collect our severance it won't be there. It has gone from milking a dying cash cow to beating a dead horse.
Who wants to advertise in a cut and paste AP wire story paper when you can buy USA Today, even The weekly World News and National Enquirer are better than most of the McClatchy pulp. ...Maybe the Enquirer has found Gary Pruitt...;P

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

For the sake of keeping the argument accurate, McClatchy Company didn't name a new VP on Friday. McClatchy Interactive did. The position wasn't a new one either - it was a change to an old position. Seriously, I doubt this guy makes 500+. Maybe 200-?

Anonymous said...

Vice president is vice president, and if this was a nothing appointment, then why did MNI make a big issue of it by writing a press release?
On salaries, I can find no MNI data on 2008 salary levels, but SEC filings show that in 2007, Bob Weil, Vice President, Operations got a $600,000, plus a 60 percent bonus, Frank Whittaker, Vice President, Operations, got 600,000 in salary plus a 60 percent bonus, Pat Talamantes, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, earned 500,000 and a 55% bonus, and Howard Weaver, Vice President, News got a $400,000 salary plus 50% bonus.
So I think $600,000 is a good approximation for what McClatchy pays its vice presidents.

Anonymous said...

That should have read $500,000 plus salary is a good approximation for what MNI pays its vice presidents.
Your $200,000 is less than what MNI is paying editors at papers.