A reader who has gone through McClatchy's SEC statements passes on this amazing info:
At the end of 2007, McClatchy had 15,748 employees
At the end of 2008, McClatchy had 12,100 employees
The difference: 3,648 employees dumped by McClatchy since the end of 2007
.
.
8 comments:
Yeah and the TWO that should be gone?
Well one is still here, the other chickenshit bailed out with his golden parachute a couple of months ago.
Gee that's a 25% purging of staff.
Can we check back next year when the percentage could be somewhat higher, like 100%
Wait a minute. If lokeman is in there somewhere, that's now 12,100.10 employees?
After all didn't lokeman have a .10
blood alcohol level? (drum roll ba-ba-ba BOOM)
McClatchy Files Form 10-K
Experts Needed: ‘Forward-looking’ would that be based on Hope & Change? What does that mean? What they hope is forward?
McClatchy Files Form 10-K
and Reports Final Results for 2008
“McClatchy disclaims any intention and assumes
[no obligation to update the (forward-looking) information] contained in this release.”
http://tinyurl.com/cc3hsq
If you can, go back a few years.
Is that a pure number that does not count any sold newspaper assets in 2007? I know the Star Tribune sale was completed in 2007 were those bodies counted at all towards that years number?
Some of us former 3,648 employees dumped McClatchy.
Anon 7:08 God Bless you!
Post a Comment